Skip to main contentSkip to contact
Ocean View Games
Ocean View
Games
Porting Feasibility Checker

Porting Feasibility Checker

Porting a game to a new platform is rarely as simple as pressing "build." Input size, resolution differences, certification requirements, and platform-specific features all affect the scope. Answer a few questions and we'll estimate the feasibility, cost, timeline, and likely challenges for your port.

What platform is the game currently on?
What platforms do you want to port to?

Select at least one target platform to see results.

What engine is the game built in?
Is the game 2D or 3D?
What is the game's complexity?
Does the game have multiplayer or online features?
Does the game use any platform-specific features?
What is the current minimum hardware target?
Do you have access to the full source code?
Are there any existing localisation requirements?

Frequently Asked Questions

The Porting Feasibility Checker estimates the complexity, cost range, timeline, and likely technical challenges for porting your game to a new platform. Based on your source and target platforms, engine, game complexity, networking model, platform-specific features, hardware tier, source code access, and localisation needs, it generates a feasibility report covering the main risk areas and effort estimate for the port.
Your specific codebase. Custom middleware, bespoke engine work, third-party plugin compatibility with the target platform's SDK, licensed content transfer rights, and platform-specific certification edge cases. For a real port, these need a manual audit. Our Mobile Game Development and Console Porting services cover this, and our Unity Modernisation service handles cases where the source is on an older Unity version that needs upgrading before the port.
The report is based on typical porting effort patterns across hundreds of real projects. It catches the common risk factors (engine compatibility, hardware constraints, certification requirements, input redesign) and gives a reasonable range for effort and timeline. It cannot predict project-specific issues like proprietary middleware, unusual dependencies, or edge cases that only surface during a detailed code review. Treat the report as a scoping starting point, not a quote.
Technically, a pure port requires source. Without it, the only path forward is a rebuild, where we reconstruct the game in a modern engine using the original as specification. This is significantly more involved than a port but is sometimes the only option for legacy titles. Our Unity modernisation service specialises in this type of project.
The tool covers the most common source and target combinations. If your specific scenario isn't represented (for example, an unusual mobile-to-console path, or a port involving VR platforms or Steam Deck specifically), the report's accuracy will be limited. Contact us for a manual feasibility assessment.
No. The tool runs entirely in your browser. The platforms, engine, complexity, and other options you select are not sent to any server or logged.
Three paths, depending on your situation. If the report suggests a low-complexity port and you have a capable team, use it as scoping input and do the work in-house. If it suggests a moderate-complexity port and you're weighing options, share the report with your team for timeline and budget planning. If it suggests a complex port or flags significant risks, send us the report as the starting point for a professional feasibility audit. Our mobile and console porting services take over from where the tool leaves off.

Need a detailed scoping assessment for your port? Let's talk.

Get a Free Consultation